A legal professional has provided an unforeseen cautionary statement, shedding light on the reasons why we should exercise prudence when utilizing the thumbs-up emoji.
Despite its frequent and thoughtless usage by texters worldwide, an unprecedented Canadian legal case has emerged, prompting us to reconsider before employing it.
Recently, a Canadian judge issued a verdict ordering a farmer to pay a buyer C$82,000 (£48,134/$62,258) after determining that the simple act of sending a thumbs-up emoji signifies acceptance of contractual terms.
Despite Chris Achter's attempt to argue that he had simply sent a thumbs-up emoji to acknowledge the receipt of a contract to purchase flax, the judge ruled against him, stating that the act of sending the emoji constituted a binding contractual agreement. Chris Achter is the proprietor of Swift Current farming company located in Saskatchewan, while Kent Mickleborough serves as the grain buyer who sent the photo of the contract.
Opting to simply leave the message as "read" would have been a significantly more cost-effective and less troublesome choice. Prior to sending the farmer a draft contract with the message "please confirm flax contract," Kent Mickleborough had a phone conversation with Chris Achter to discuss the potential purchase.
Following the farming company owner's failure to meet the specified deadline for delivering the flax, a disagreement arose between the parties regarding the interpretation of the thumbs-up emoji, ultimately leading to the court case. As a result of Chris Achter's inability to fulfill the contract, the judge ruled in favor of the buyer, ordering reimbursement.
This ruling has now raised concerns, as a legal expert warns that judges outside of Canada may reference this case as supporting evidence in similar situations involving the thumbs-up emoji. Andrew Rich, the head of national industrial and employment law at Slater and Gordon in Australia, stated that an Australian court could take this legal decision into consideration when issuing its own ruling, perceiving it as a suggestion or guidance from another jurisdiction.
In addition, during an interview with 7News, Andrew Rich emphasized that although the case does not establish a legally binding precedent, it showcases the ongoing process of updating the law to align with the contemporary realities of our everyday lives.
Rich highlighted that this case serves as a reminder for individuals to be more mindful of the implications arising from the use of emojis and other emerging modes of communication.
He further advised individuals to exercise clarity in expressing their intentions when sending and receiving contracts, urging them to diligently read through all relevant documentation. If any discomfort arises, seeking legal counsel was strongly recommended by Rich.
Please don't forget to SHARE this with your friends and family.
0 commentaires :